Advisory

Strategy before technology

Right now, this is probably the biggest gap in most organisations. Only 29% of SMEs using generative AI report using it in their core business activities — the rest is peripheral, bolted onto the edges rather than shaping how the business is actually run. Boards aren’t using AI to set strategic direction. They’re applying it operationally, and risking the opportunities that matter most.

AI adoption is moving faster than the dot-com boom ever did. But 60% of companies report generating no material value from their AI investment. Speed isn’t the same as value. Often it just means doing the wrong thing faster.

We flip the sequence. Strategic thinking first, before technology, not after — so every AI investment is aligned to where the business is actually going, not just what’s technically possible.

We’re also vendor independent. We don’t sell licences or software subscriptions. When we recommend a tool, it’s because it’s the right one for your situation — not because we make money from the sale.

Strategy

A structured assessment of where AI genuinely creates competitive advantage for your business — not a generic framework. Delivered as a board-ready briefing and a prioritised roadmap your team can act on. We also help you decide what not to buy.

Governance

Once direction is set, we build the oversight structure that keeps it accountable — who owns AI decisions, how risk gets tracked, how the board stays informed. Delivered as a governance framework your board can adopt, not a policy document that sits in a drawer.

Sources

  1. 1.OECD, AI Adoption by Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (2025)
  2. 2.BCG, The Widening AI Value Gap (2025)
  3. 3.Forbes, Companies Need to Redesign Around AI, Not Just Adopt It (2026)